Skip to main content

Diversity starts with inclusion.

Diversity hiring has become a hot topic lately. With several companies being pushed into the limelight for either doing a great job of diversifying their workforce, or doing it incredibly poorly, it's become a major discussion point for most recruiting teams across all industries. Something I've personally noticed in various conversations is the lack of clarity and understanding of what the word "diversity" really correlates to.

"I believe Diversity was an old, old wooden ship." - Ron Burgandy, Anchorman

The word diversity essentially boils down to: "a variety of different things". When we think about diversity in the workplace, it can be reduced to identifying factors such as ethnicity, gender identity, religious beliefs, nationalities, veteran status, disabilities, and many other under represented groups that typically fall into a protected EEO category. What many businesses fail to keep in mind is that checking a box is not enough. Without first focusing on creating and nurturing an inclusive environment where there is a high degree of psychological safety, authenticity, and equality amongst employees, we are only checking a box and can easily unknowingly create a divisive workplace. 

For a number of organizations, optics are what push diversity hiring, not perspective. This is important to note. When optics are the focus, rather than the perspectives and experiences people bring into an organization, there is a lot of room left to interpretation on what diversity really means. It also leaves an open door for potential lawsuits when qualified candidates are avoided because they're not from an obviously identifiable under-represented population. Military veterans, gender identities, sexual preferences, and people living with disabilities are a few examples of how diversity is often invisible. It's easy to associate diversity with a difference in appearances, but let's not lose sight of why diversity is important in the first place. The value comes from a variety of different thoughts, experiences, and perspectives that are contributed to each another's overall understanding of the world around us. These qualities can be linked to innovation, which is where the true value lies for businesses. 

Diversity of thought provides incredibly valuable dimensions in a work environment. Ultimately, every single one of us has our own unique perspective, which is based on our experiences and how we've processed everything around us. Our perspectives shape our realities and our experiences help shape our overall views, which play a huge role in how we work together and approach solving problems.

Although diversity hiring is typically done with the best of intentions, it can end up having a negative affect when the intentions are not genuine. Ultimately, there needs to be an inclusive environment before there can ever be a focus on diversity in any kind of sustainable way. Hiring for inclusive traits (e.g. self-awareness, curiosity, empathy, perspective) ensures an environment where everyone can be authentic and feel accepted. If the focus is on optics, the culture can quickly become divisive and counter productive.

For instance, focusing entirely on hiring women to ensure there is a 50/50 ratio of men to women sounds like a good idea in theory. But in reality, it invites the potential of avoiding interviewing and considering qualified men for the same jobs. This isn't only discrimination (not to mention illegal), but it also leaves room for discrimination against people of other under represented groups. It's vital for us to be mindful of the repercussions of these unconscious biases and narrow approaches to diversity hiring so we don't inadvertently discriminate on our way to avoiding discrimination. Ironic, isn't it?

Being aware is the first step to reminding ourselves and each other of the foundational importance of diversity: thoughts, perspective, and experiences over optics. Once we understand the reasons behind the decisions we make, the more equipped we'll be to build an inclusive and diverse work environment.

**This post is reflective of my personal views and does not necessarily reflect that of my current of past employers**

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recruiting is an art and a science.

Traditional recruiting involves gathering as many applications as possible and hoping the right one finds its way to the top. At any given point in time, the candidate pool will change, so essentially this means you're left trying to find the best of what's available and not necessarily the best candidate for the role. Most recruiting teams focus on gathering rather than hunting; being reactive rather than strategic. The focus has primarily been on high volume and a short time-to-fill (the period of time it takes between posting a job to hiring someone into the role) rather than searching for highly qualified candidates in a proactive manner. Outdated recruiting practices are inefficient and costly for many reasons, but many companies continue to use them today. Compare candidates to the requirements of the role, not to each other. Hiring is expensive and extremely time consuming. Unfortunately, we've become accustomed to believing that talking to more candidates means

Human(e) Resources: Building a Culture of Trust

Human Resources more often than not has reflected an ideology that employees are liabilities instead of assets. From the way the subject is typically taught, implemented, and understood, HR is handled with the assumption that employees' intentions are bad rather than good. It may sound trivial, but this one shift in perception can have a huge impact on a company's culture all the way through its bottomline. Guidelines vs Policies Most HR policies are done reactively, either due to something that happened at the company directly or as an attempt to learn from other companies' mistakes. Regardless, these policies are in place to protect the company and not its employees. EEOC regulations and employment laws are there to protect employees, but by the time those come into play, it's usually too late for the company to fix the problem without penalty. The conundrum ends up cycling with the company trying to cover its tracks and employees filing claims after leaving in

The great, the bad, and the average.

There are a million blog posts describing all the characteristics of bad recruiters - trust me, I'm well aware. I constantly battle this perspective when working with candidates for the first time. So what does it take to be great? I mean really great, not just above average. Let's face it - average is still not a place any recruiter wants to be. The TL;DR of it is this:  Create a great experience from start to finish. This should apply to the way you work with candidates and the teams you support. Do what's best for the candidate and your teams.  Changing jobs is one of the most stressful events of a person's life. Don't forget that this is a matchmaking process meant to find the right person for the long run. Be honest and responsive. Searching for a job can be as stressful as starting a new one. You're busy, I get it. So is everyone. But make it a priority to respond to anyone that reaches out to you, even if they're not a fit. And always - always